<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Glump.net]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://glump.net]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Comments]]></description>
<generator>Commentics</generator>
<item>
<title>Heiko</title>
<link><![CDATA[https://glump.net/blog/review/youve-probably-never-heard-of-my-favorite-pdf-viewer-okular?cmtx_perm=14#cmtx_perm_14]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is also Okular... Why? The fast startup and the fast rendering on complex documents (I have a document with a "confidential" across it - Okular is 10 times faster on it. Similar for pictures in documents).</p><p>Still two reasons to have Adobe:<br>
1) It can print (Okular cannot do this for me?!)<br>
2) Adobe can fill in documents</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:20:56 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">item_14</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Evan</title>
<link><![CDATA[https://glump.net/blog/review/youve-probably-never-heard-of-my-favorite-pdf-viewer-okular?cmtx_perm=13#cmtx_perm_13]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmm interesting.. I have only used Adobe Reader myself.. I generally don't often find myself wading through PDF's of large nature.. but I recently had some large D&amp;D manuals in PDF form.. I find it difficult to read them at a desktop machine, but I suppose if I had a netbook/e- reader or some such thing, I might be more inclined to search out alternatives.. I can see why you would appreciate the table-of-contents-search</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:08:11 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">item_13</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>